https://github.com/SkyBlue997/enableMacosAI 欢迎大家提 issue 或者一起完善
https://github.com/SkyBlue997/enableMacosAI 欢迎大家提 issue 或者一起完善
https://github.com/SkyBlue997/enableMacosAI 欢迎大家提 issue 或者一起完善
https://github.com/SkyBlue997/enableMacosAI 欢迎大家提 issue 或者一起完善
https://github.com/SkyBlue997/enableMacosAI 欢迎大家提 issue 或者一起完善
https://github.com/SkyBlue997/enableMacosAI 欢迎大家提 issue 或者一起完善
https://github.com/SkyBlue997/enableMacosAI 欢迎大家提 issue 或者一起完善
https://github.com/SkyBlue997/enableMacosAI 欢迎大家提 issue 或者一起完善
https://github.com/SkyBlue997/enableMacosAI 欢迎大家提 issue 或者一起完善
https://github.com/SkyBlue997/enableMacosAI 欢迎大家提 issue 或者一起完善
https://github.com/SkyBlue997/enableMacosAI 欢迎大家提 issue 或者一起完善
https://github.com/SkyBlue997/enableMacosAI 欢迎大家提 issue 或者一起完善
我的这个项目 https://github.com/duhbbx/SkylerX ，数据库连接工具 打包后下载，在 windows 上安装会提示：会提示未知的发布者，然后问了下 AI ，让我去申请一下 SignPath Foundation ，说是可以免费给我提供签名，他奶奶的，也没有说 SignPath Foundation 有门槛呀！我以为是开源的，项目差不多，不是那种糊弄型的就行了，结果我发申请后的一周，把我直接拒了。 大概意思就是：不是我这个项目质量不行，而是这个项目的知名度不够，fork 数，star 数太惨淡了；然后就是其他社区也没有什么公开讨论，所以暂时不赞助。 话又说回来了，我要是知名度高了，还会申请你这个吗？ 想问下群友，有申请成功的吗，我想看下？有啥标准不？ thank you for applying to the SignPath Foundation program and for taking the time to provide details about your project in the OSS Request Form. After a review of your submission, we regret to inform you that we cannot approve your application at this time. When evaluating projects for the SignPath Foundation program, we look at a combination of factors that help us verify a project’s reputation and standing. These typically include signals such as: Community adoption (e.g., GitHub stars, forks, contributors) Independent references or discussions (Reddit, Stack Overflow, YouTube, etc.) External articles, blog posts, or institutional backing Evidence of sustained activity and user engagement At the moment, your project does not yet provide sufficient external verification signals for us to issue a Foundation certificate in our name. Please note that this is not a judgment on the quality or potential of your work. The Foundation program is designed specifically for projects that have already established a certain level of public trust and visibility. We encourage you to continue developing and growing your project. Once it has gained broader recognition, you are very welcome to reapply, we would be happy to review it again. Thank you again for your interest, and we wish you continued success with your project.
我的这个项目 https://github.com/duhbbx/SkylerX ，数据库连接工具 打包后下载，在 windows 上安装会提示：会提示未知的发布者，然后问了下 AI ，让我去申请一下 SignPath Foundation ，说是可以免费给我提供签名，他奶奶的，也没有说 SignPath Foundation 有门槛呀！我以为是开源的，项目差不多，不是那种糊弄型的就行了，结果我发申请后的一周，把我直接拒了。 大概意思就是：不是我这个项目质量不行，而是这个项目的知名度不够，fork 数，star 数太惨淡了；然后就是其他社区也没有什么公开讨论，所以暂时不赞助。 话又说回来了，我要是知名度高了，还会申请你这个吗？ 想问下群友，有申请成功的吗，我想看下？有啥标准不？ thank you for applying to the SignPath Foundation program and for taking the time to provide details about your project in the OSS Request Form. After a review of your submission, we regret to inform you that we cannot approve your application at this time. When evaluating projects for the SignPath Foundation program, we look at a combination of factors that help us verify a project’s reputation and standing. These typically include signals such as: Community adoption (e.g., GitHub stars, forks, contributors) Independent references or discussions (Reddit, Stack Overflow, YouTube, etc.) External articles, blog posts, or institutional backing Evidence of sustained activity and user engagement At the moment, your project does not yet provide sufficient external verification signals for us to issue a Foundation certificate in our name. Please note that this is not a judgment on the quality or potential of your work. The Foundation program is designed specifically for projects that have already established a certain level of public trust and visibility. We encourage you to continue developing and growing your project. Once it has gained broader recognition, you are very welcome to reapply, we would be happy to review it again. Thank you again for your interest, and we wish you continued success with your project.
我的这个项目 https://github.com/duhbbx/SkylerX ，数据库连接工具 打包后下载，在 windows 上安装会提示：会提示未知的发布者，然后问了下 AI ，让我去申请一下 SignPath Foundation ，说是可以免费给我提供签名，他奶奶的，也没有说 SignPath Foundation 有门槛呀！我以为是开源的，项目差不多，不是那种糊弄型的就行了，结果我发申请后的一周，把我直接拒了。 大概意思就是：不是我这个项目质量不行，而是这个项目的知名度不够，fork 数，star 数太惨淡了；然后就是其他社区也没有什么公开讨论，所以暂时不赞助。 话又说回来了，我要是知名度高了，还会申请你这个吗？ 想问下群友，有申请成功的吗，我想看下？有啥标准不？ thank you for applying to the SignPath Foundation program and for taking the time to provide details about your project in the OSS Request Form. After a review of your submission, we regret to inform you that we cannot approve your application at this time. When evaluating projects for the SignPath Foundation program, we look at a combination of factors that help us verify a project’s reputation and standing. These typically include signals such as: Community adoption (e.g., GitHub stars, forks, contributors) Independent references or discussions (Reddit, Stack Overflow, YouTube, etc.) External articles, blog posts, or institutional backing Evidence of sustained activity and user engagement At the moment, your project does not yet provide sufficient external verification signals for us to issue a Foundation certificate in our name. Please note that this is not a judgment on the quality or potential of your work. The Foundation program is designed specifically for projects that have already established a certain level of public trust and visibility. We encourage you to continue developing and growing your project. Once it has gained broader recognition, you are very welcome to reapply, we would be happy to review it again. Thank you again for your interest, and we wish you continued success with your project.
我的这个项目 https://github.com/duhbbx/SkylerX ，数据库连接工具 打包后下载，在 windows 上安装会提示：会提示未知的发布者，然后问了下 AI ，让我去申请一下 SignPath Foundation ，说是可以免费给我提供签名，他奶奶的，也没有说 SignPath Foundation 有门槛呀！我以为是开源的，项目差不多，不是那种糊弄型的就行了，结果我发申请后的一周，把我直接拒了。 大概意思就是：不是我这个项目质量不行，而是这个项目的知名度不够，fork 数，star 数太惨淡了；然后就是其他社区也没有什么公开讨论，所以暂时不赞助。 话又说回来了，我要是知名度高了，还会申请你这个吗？ 想问下群友，有申请成功的吗，我想看下？有啥标准不？ thank you for applying to the SignPath Foundation program and for taking the time to provide details about your project in the OSS Request Form. After a review of your submission, we regret to inform you that we cannot approve your application at this time. When evaluating projects for the SignPath Foundation program, we look at a combination of factors that help us verify a project’s reputation and standing. These typically include signals such as: Community adoption (e.g., GitHub stars, forks, contributors) Independent references or discussions (Reddit, Stack Overflow, YouTube, etc.) External articles, blog posts, or institutional backing Evidence of sustained activity and user engagement At the moment, your project does not yet provide sufficient external verification signals for us to issue a Foundation certificate in our name. Please note that this is not a judgment on the quality or potential of your work. The Foundation program is designed specifically for projects that have already established a certain level of public trust and visibility. We encourage you to continue developing and growing your project. Once it has gained broader recognition, you are very welcome to reapply, we would be happy to review it again. Thank you again for your interest, and we wish you continued success with your project.
Bluesky首席运营官罗斯·王（Rose Wang）近日在接受采访时表示，当前各国针对社交媒体平台的监管思路，尤其是儿童用网禁令和更严苛的合规要求，可能在客观上固化大型科技公司的垄断地位，让资本雄厚的巨头更易生存，却大幅抬高中小创新企业的进入门槛。 自2000年代社交媒体面向大众以来，相关监管长期相对宽松，这一阶段为Meta、Snapchat、Google等平台积累用户、巩固市场份额提供了空间，其中以Meta最为突出。在完成“做大做强”后，Meta被指正尝试通过推动更严格的行业监管，来实现所谓“监管俘获”：一方面利用自身雄厚资金从容应对合规成本，另一方面则在制度上加重后来者负担，使新兴社交平台更难撼动其既有优势。 王在接受CNBC采访时强调，她支持保护青少年和网络安全的目标，但担忧过度监管带来的长期后果。她指出，如果以重合规、高门槛为核心的监管路线持续下去，社交媒体行业可能滑向只剩三到五家大型平台的格局，而这些平台的合规团队规模甚至可能是Bluesky整个团队的十倍，这将使小型创新者几乎不可能进入市场、建设更健康的线上社区。 在王看来，大型平台过于强调“利润导向”，在内容治理和用户保护上长期失职，才迫使政府不得不介入监管。但她同时强调，监管设计不应以牺牲竞争和创新为代价，而应通过更多机制让中小平台有机会与监管部门直接沟通，反馈自身在履行合规义务时面临的现实困难。 王表示，Bluesky并不反对监管本身，而是呼吁在监管执行层面区分不同规模和资源条件的平台，通过更顺畅的沟通渠道，避免中小玩家在制度设计中“失声”。她同时直言，那些被反复曝出规避监管的大型科技公司，才应成为监管重点对象，不能继续利用规则漏洞巩固既得利益。 即便如此，Bluesky提出的思路更多聚焦于维护市场竞争本身，却尚未从根本上回应围绕当前未成年人社交媒体禁令和年龄验证制度所引发的隐私争议。相关措施往往要求用户提交敏感身份文件，以证明年龄并访问受限制内容，这在隐私保护方面埋下了新的风险，引发社会各界对数据安全和滥用问题的持续担忧。 本次发声延续了业界关于“如何在保护未成年人、维护隐私与保持市场竞争活力之间取得平衡”的激烈讨论。在监管环境愈发趋严的背景下，Bluesky等新兴平台的处境，正成为衡量新规是否真正兼顾安全与创新的一面镜子。 查看评论
ES9 刚贴完膜，还是很帅的。Blue sky Coming ！
ES9 刚贴完膜，还是很帅的。Blue sky Coming ！
ES9 刚贴完膜，还是很帅的。Blue sky Coming ！